Chat on IRC |
Visual Basic GUI and C++ Power
Posted by eternaldisciple [send private reply] at February 14, 2002, 08:44:21 AM
What would be a decent resource for calling C++ programs from a Visual Basic GUI or the other way around? I just don't feel like learning all the wonderfully intricate MS Visual C++ code right now. That's a project for a later date. Thanks.
Posted by vladimir_l [send private reply] at February 14, 2002, 12:08:05 PM
VC++ is not powerful. :) . I have had so many errors - frankly its not worth learning. I bought a book on it once ( now I know whey they reduced it to $8 :) ). All your troubles wil be solved by installing Borland C++ 3.1.
Posted by eternaldisciple [send private reply] at February 14, 2002, 09:18:37 PM
Yes, well, whichever compiler or whatever. My issue right now is just using the VB gui and C++ code.
Posted by gian [send private reply] at February 15, 2002, 01:32:19 AM
Borland C++ Builder will make the Visual design lover in you feel right at home, except with some grunt driving that pretty front end!
Posted by vladimir_l [send private reply] at February 15, 2002, 07:48:31 AM
Gian da ya know if Borland Turbo C++ Builder is still avalible ? I heard it was a good builder , win16 and dos.
You mean the installation of a car with of all the things falshing. :) Yeah thatsan enoughing feature but a good one. Borland 5.02 is best ofr Visual , but 3.1 or Builder 3 is so stable that it can even be coompared with Fortrand compilers. -Vlad
Posted by CViper [send private reply] at February 15, 2002, 02:43:42 PM
i never had problems with vc++ (well except when trying to modify the wizard-generated code :p )
btw is it std with borland that ctrl-s put you in search mode instead of saving the file? it's that way at school and i absolutly hate it!
Posted by gian [send private reply] at February 15, 2002, 04:06:37 PM
Depends which borland you are using.... people often forget to make the distinction between Borland C++ Builder, and normal old Borland C++.... they are very different.
Posted by vladimir_l [send private reply] at February 15, 2002, 05:56:00 PM
You dont understand your problems are minor , Borland C++ is much more ssstable - proven. It is prefferd over VC++ by many people. Borland are the professionals :).
Gian da ya know if Borland Turbo C++ Builder is still avalible ? I heard it was a good builder , win16 and dos.
Posted by gian [send private reply] at February 15, 2002, 08:45:24 PM
I have no idea if BTCB is still available, and don't really care either...
I would have to disagree that Borland are the professionals anymore, because they've been bought by Corel ;-)
Posted by vladimir_l [send private reply] at February 16, 2002, 06:42:25 AM
That is pehaps so , but I think their compilers ,are the best. The errors are well documented , and it is a much more stable enviroment than VC++ or Dev C++ .
Posted by CViper [send private reply] at February 16, 2002, 06:59:38 AM
well i guess i like vc++ more because i always used it, and i suppose it's the same way if you are used to borland xxxx.
the only problem i've had so far with vc++ is that it freezes sometimes when viewing files with inline assembly. about that with the professionals - i dont know, but a lot of source packages come with the vc++ workspaces
Posted by metamorphic [send private reply] at February 17, 2002, 07:56:49 AM
the VB interface and VC++ interfaces cannot be swapped. What you can do though is use the VC++ interface and a different c++ compiler. These is a thread at gamedev.net about this. its good and i would recomend giving it a read:
http://gamedev.net/community/forums/topic.asp?topic_id=80223
Posted by gian [send private reply] at February 18, 2002, 12:22:01 AM
I must say I think that VC++ is one of the best MS products to date.
What do you mean by "Lots of errors" Vlad? To date, I have had no errors that I can see (that is if you mean bugs in the Compiler/IDE itself). If you mean errors as in compiling errors, then that has nothing to do with VC++.
Posted by vladimir_l [send private reply] at February 19, 2002, 01:26:58 PM
Heheheh IDE errors dude , the compiler erros are also probalby internal I mean there just could be errors in the program I tried no 10 anyway. THe compiler erros in Borland 3.1 are much better documented....
Register as a new user | ||||||||||||||||